Depending Against the RPG – How Tanks are defeating the Rocket

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Like the AK-47, the Soviet RPG-7 rocket propelled grenade has become one of the most widely-distributed infantry weapons on Earth, used by everyone from E8 nations to guerrilla insurgency groups in every major conflict since Vietnam. But their ubiquitousness nature has kicked off a global race focused on how to beat them.

First developed by the Soviet Union shortly after WWII, the original RPG-2 was Russia’s answer to the American bazooka and German Panzerfaust. Its successor, the RPG-7, retains much of the same functionality—a hand-held, unguided, rocket-propelled grenade launcher designed to kill or disable armored units (tanks, APCs, etc) and fortified positions. For a weapon measuring just over a yard long with a 40mm bore and weighing about 15 pounds, the RPG-7 packs one hell of a wallop.

Its rounds measure 40 – 105 mm in diameter and weigh 4 – 10 pounds, depending on the type of charge—HEAT for anti-armor, fragmentation for anti-personnel, or a tandem charge for defeating reactive armor. Using a gunpowder propellent, the round travels up to 295 m/s and is accurate to up to 500 m (max range 920 m) thanks to a set of air-deployed stabilizing fins.

Tandem charges—in which a weaker initial charge explodes first to create a channel for the secondary HEAT explosive to penetrate the target’s reactive armor—have proven exceptionally effective against armored units. They can burn through up to 500 mm of steel armor. And it’s these rounds that have set off an arms race between opposing armor and RPG technologies.

The first defensive advancement debuted at the tail end of WWII, when armored units began sporting wire mesh skirt armor (aka cage, slat, bar, or standoff armor). This densely-slatted secondary protection sits in front of the tank’s primary skin, trapping the RPG round between a pair of bars far enough away that the initial shaped charge cannot damage the armor, while short circuiting the piezoelectric precursor to either prevent the HEAT charge from detonating or at least denying the charge’s molten jet a route into the tank’s interior.

Essentially, since the tandem charge is only effective if it actually hits the target, cage armor is designed to catch the incoming RPG round before it does. Originally, this rigid slatted metal grid fitted around key sections of the vehicle was made from heavy steel or aluminum, weighing about 20-30 kg/sq.m. However modern day composite variants, such as Chobham armor—or BAE’s LROD system employed by the Buffalo MPV—offer superior protection compared to steel cages yet weigh less than aluminum.

That said, slat armor is far from foolproof. Instead it offers what’s known as statistical protection; that is, while the system doesn’t offer a complete defense against RPGs, it does lower the probability that a tandem-charge shot will be successful by 50 to 70 percent, depending on where and how the RPG connects. If a second shot happens to strike the same spot, you’re in trouble.

But even with cage armor’s shortcomings, the weight savings and improved defensive capabilities that it provides far outweigh its potential failure risks. As such, cage armor is extensively employed in armored divisions the world over, from the IDF’s Caterpillar D9R armored bulldozer to the General Dynamics Stryker and M113 APC to Russian T-62 and American M1 Abrams tanks.

One new area evolving area involves the Israeli system known as the Trophy, originally developed in 2009, its new variants have been proven as a successful defense against RPG fire, as it propels a shot gun like blast to intercept and destroy the RPG rocket well outside of its lethal range.  Systems can cost as much as $300,000 USD, though, the lighter version is adaptable enough for helicopters, and other lightly armor vehicles.  With a combination of the Trophy repellent system and the cage armour, the race between the sword and shield continues its one ups manship.